Cost, speed, and risk tradeoffs for small and mid-market teams
Cost, speed, and risk tradeoffs for small and mid-market teams
Last Updated: February 2026
10 Pages
https://sg1consulting.com.au
If you need results in the next 30-90 days, a consultant-led pilot is usually faster and lower risk. If you have a stable automation backlog, internal technical leadership, and budget for ramp time, an in-house AI ops hire can be the right long-term model.
| Factor | Consultant / SG1-style engagement | In-house AI ops hire |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first pilot | 30-60 days typical | 2-6 months (hire + onboarding + build) |
| Cost profile (AUD) | Project/pilot spend | Salary + super + on-costs + tooling + management |
| Execution risk | Lower if methodology is proven | Depends on hire quality and scope control |
| Institutional knowledge | Needs documentation transfer | Builds internally over time |
| Best fit | Urgent bottleneck relief and pilot validation | Ongoing automation program at scale |
Hybrid path
| Phase | Approach | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | Consultant-led pilot | Validate ROI and control model |
| Phase 2 | Consultant + internal owner | Documented processes and handover |
| Phase 3 | In-house AI ops hire (optional) | Scale across more workflows |
If you are deciding between a pilot engagement and internal hiring, compare this with our pilot-first vs full transformation guide and the pilot ROI methodology. AU teams should compare this against expected hiring lead time and retained capability needs.
Get a personalized assessment of automation opportunities in your business. We will identify the highest-ROI processes to automate first.
Start Free AI AnalysisEmail: [email protected]
Phone: +61 410 652 449
Click "Download PDF" for the clean export, or use Ctrl/Cmd + P and select "Save as PDF" as the destination.
For best results, use Chrome or Edge browser.